viewersbot.com
Editorial· Updated October 24, 2026· Prices from vendors' public pages

Editorial guidelines

The rules our writers and editors follow on every page.

Table of contents
  1. 01Independence
  2. 02Accuracy and sourcing
  3. 03Scoring rubric
  4. 04Conflicts of interest
  5. 05Corrections and right of reply
  6. 06Takedown requests
  7. 07Contact the editor

Independence

Editors decide what we review, how it is scored and what we recommend. Commercial partners do not see or approve content before it is published.

Accuracy and sourcing

  • Prices, plans and policies are taken from the vendor’s own public pages and dated.
  • Where we rely on a third-party source, we name it on the page.
  • We do not invent statistics, test results, quotes or reviewers.
  • Platform rules (Twitch, Kick) are summarised from their official help pages.

Scoring rubric

All services are scored on the same five criteria described in How we test.

Conflicts of interest

What we disclose

viewersbot.com earns commission through some links. Featured placements are labelled. See the advertising disclosure.

What we will not do

  • Accept payment for a score or ranking position.
  • Publish content written by a vendor as our own.
  • Hide material policy terms (refunds, cancellations, what a service asks for).

Corrections and right of reply

If we get something wrong we fix it and note significant changes. Vendors can reply to a review by emailing [email protected] with evidence; we review every request.

Takedown requests

We consider takedown requests for factual errors or legal issues. We do not remove accurate, sourced information because it is unflattering.

Contact the editor

[email protected]